Dialog Theory For Critical Argumentation

Dialog Theory For Critical Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Dialog Theory For Critical Argumentation book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.

Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation

Douglas N. Walton
Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Douglas N. Walton
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing
Page : 329 pages
File Size : 49,7 Mb
Release : 2007-09-19
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9789027292001

Get Book

Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation by Douglas N. Walton Pdf

Because of the need to devise systems for electronic communication on the internet, multi-agent computing is moving to a model of communication as a structured conversation between rational agents. For example, in multi-agent systems, an electronic agent searches around the internet, and collects certain kinds of information by asking questions to other agents. Such agents also reason with each other when they engage in negotiation and persuasion. It is shown in this book that critical argumentation is best represented in this framework by the model of reasoned argument called a dialog, in which two or more parties engage in a polite and orderly exchange with each other according to rules governed by conversation policies. In such dialog argumentation, the two parties reason together by taking turns asking questions, offering replies, and offering reasons to support a claim. They try to settle their disagreements by an orderly conversational exchange that is partly adversarial and partly collaborative.

Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation

Douglas N. Walton
Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Douglas N. Walton
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing
Page : 336 pages
File Size : 51,9 Mb
Release : 2007
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9027218854

Get Book

Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation by Douglas N. Walton Pdf

Because of the need to devise systems for electronic communication on the internet, multi-agent computing is moving to a model of communication as a structured conversation between rational agents. For example, in multi-agent systems, an electronic agent searches around the internet, and collects certain kinds of information by asking questions to other agents. Such agents also reason with each other when they engage in negotiation and persuasion. It is shown in this book that critical argumentation is best represented in this framework by the model of reasoned argument called a dialog, in which two or more parties engage in a polite and orderly exchange with each other according to rules governed by conversation policies. In such dialog argumentation, the two parties reason together by taking turns asking questions, offering replies, and offering reasons to support a claim. They try to settle their disagreements by an orderly conversational exchange that is partly adversarial and partly collaborative.

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation

Douglas Walton
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Douglas Walton
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 368 pages
File Size : 49,8 Mb
Release : 2006
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 0521823196

Get Book

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation by Douglas Walton Pdf

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation presents the basic tools for the identification, analysis, and evaluation of common arguments for beginners. The book teaches by using examples of arguments in dialogues, both in the text itself and in the exercises. Examples of controversial legal, political, and ethical arguments are analyzed. Illustrating the most common kinds of arguments, the book also explains how to analyze and evaluate each kind by critical questioning. Douglas Walton shows how arguments can be reasonable under the right dialogue conditions by using critical questions to evaluate them.

Anyone Who Has a View

F.H. van Eemeren,J. Anthony Blair,Charles A. Willard,A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Anyone Who Has a View Book PDF

Author : F.H. van Eemeren,J. Anthony Blair,Charles A. Willard,A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Publisher : Springer Science & Business Media
Page : 347 pages
File Size : 54,9 Mb
Release : 2012-12-06
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 9789400710788

Get Book

Anyone Who Has a View by F.H. van Eemeren,J. Anthony Blair,Charles A. Willard,A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans Pdf

This volume contains a selection of papers from the International Conference on Argumentation (Amsterdam, 2002) by prominent international scholars of argumentation theory. It provides an insightful cross-section of the current state of affairs in argumentation research. It will be of interest to all those working in the field of argumentation theory and to all scholars who are interested in recent developments in this field.

Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory

F. H. van Eemeren
Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory Book PDF

Author : F. H. van Eemeren
Publisher : Amsterdam University Press
Page : 244 pages
File Size : 50,5 Mb
Release : 2001
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 905356523X

Get Book

Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory by F. H. van Eemeren Pdf

Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory is a collection of essays that discuss a series of important issues in the study of argumentation. The essays describe the concepts that are crucial to argumentational research and the various ways these concepts have been approached. The essays explore such issues as points of view, unexpressed premises, argument schemes, argumentation structures, fallacies, argument interpretation and reconstruction, and argumentation in law. Each of the essays provides interested readers with an overview of the literature that can serve as a point of departure for further study.

Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation

J. Anthony Blair
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation Book PDF

Author : J. Anthony Blair
Publisher : Springer Science & Business Media
Page : 358 pages
File Size : 40,6 Mb
Release : 2011-10-20
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 9400723636

Get Book

Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation by J. Anthony Blair Pdf

J. Anthony Blair is a prominent international figure in argumentation studies. He is among the originators of informal logic, an author of textbooks on the informal logic approach to argument analysis and evaluation and on critical thinking, and a founder and editor of the journal Informal Logic. Blair is widely recognized among the leaders in the field for contributing formative ideas to the argumentation literature of the last few decades. This selection of key works provides insights into the history of the field of argumentation theory and various related disciplines. It illuminates the central debates and presents core ideas in four main areas: Critical Thinking, Informal Logic, Argument Theory and Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric.

Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation

Douglas Walton
Burden of Proof Presumption and Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Douglas Walton
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 321 pages
File Size : 55,7 Mb
Release : 2014-06-30
Category : Computers
ISBN : 9781107046627

Get Book

Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation by Douglas Walton Pdf

This book explains how burden of proof and presumption work as powerful devices in argumentation, based on studying many clearly explained legal and non-legal examples. It shows how the latest argumentation-based methods of artificial intelligence can be applied to these examples to help us understand how burdens of proof and presumptions work as devices of legal reasoning. It also shows the reader how to deal with presumptions and burdens of proof in everyday life, as they shift from one side to the other, sometimes confusingly, during a sequence of argumentation.

Relevance in Argumentation

Douglas Walton
Relevance in Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Douglas Walton
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 328 pages
File Size : 47,7 Mb
Release : 2003-10-17
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781135618964

Get Book

Relevance in Argumentation by Douglas Walton Pdf

In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which an argument, or part of an argument, has been criticized as irrelevant. Walton's method is based on a new theory of relevance that incorporates techniques of argumentation theory, logic, and artificial intelligence. The work uses a case-study approach with numerous examples of controversial arguments, strategies of attack in argumentation, and fallacies. Walton reviews ordinary cases of irrelevance in argumentation, and uses them as a basis to advance and develop his new theory of irrelevance and relevance. The volume also presents a clear account of the technical problems in the previous attempts to define relevance, including an analysis of formal systems of relevance logic and an explanation of the Grecian notion of conversational relevance. This volume is intended for graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in those fields using argumentation theory--especially philosophy, linguistics, cognitive science and communication studies, in addition to argumentation. The work also has practical use, as it applies theory directly to familiar examples of argumentation in daily and professional life. With a clear and comprehensive method for determining relevance and irrelevance, it can be convincingly applied to highly significant practical problems about relevance, including those in legal and political argumentation.

Ethical Argumentation

Douglas N. Walton
Ethical Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Douglas N. Walton
Publisher : Lexington Books
Page : 338 pages
File Size : 43,7 Mb
Release : 2003
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 0739103490

Get Book

Ethical Argumentation by Douglas N. Walton Pdf

Bridging the gap between applied ethics and ethical theory, Ethical Argumentation draws on recent research in argumentation theory to develop a more realistic model of how ethical justification actually works. Douglas Walton presents a new model of ethical argumentation in which ethical justification is analyzed as a defeasible form of argumentation considered in a balanced dialogue. Walton's new model employs techniques such as: asking the appropriate critical questions, probing accepted values, finding nonexplicit assumptions in an ethical argument, and deconstructing emotive terms and persuasive definitions. This book will be of significant interest to scholars and advanced students in applied ethics and theory.

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory

Frans H. van Eemeren,Rob Grootendorst,Ralph H. Johnson,Christian Plantin,Charles A. Willard
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory Book PDF

Author : Frans H. van Eemeren,Rob Grootendorst,Ralph H. Johnson,Christian Plantin,Charles A. Willard
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 439 pages
File Size : 47,7 Mb
Release : 2013-11-05
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781136688041

Get Book

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory by Frans H. van Eemeren,Rob Grootendorst,Ralph H. Johnson,Christian Plantin,Charles A. Willard Pdf

Argumentation theory is a distinctly multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data, assumptions, and methods from disciplines as disparate as formal logic and discourse analysis, linguistics and forensic science, philosophy and psychology, political science and education, sociology and law, and rhetoric and artificial intelligence. This presents the growing group of interested scholars and students with a problem of access, since it is even for those active in the field not common to have acquired a familiarity with relevant aspects of each discipline that enters into this multidisciplinary matrix. This book offers its readers a unique comprehensive survey of the various theoretical contributions which have been made to the study of argumentation. It discusses the historical works that provide the background to the field and all major approaches and trends in contemporary research. Argument has been the subject of systematic inquiry for twenty-five hundred years. It has been graced with theories, such as formal logic or the legal theory of evidence, that have acquired a more or less settled provenance with regard to specific issues. But there has been nothing to date that qualifies as a unified general theory of argumentation, in all its richness and complexity. This being so, the argumentation theorist must have access to materials and methods that lie beyond his or her "home" subject. It is precisely on this account that this volume is offered to all the constituent research communities and their students. Apart from the historical sections, each chapter provides an economical introduction to the problems and methods that characterize a given part of the contemporary research program. Because the chapters are self-contained, they can be consulted in the order of a reader's interests or research requirements. But there is value in reading the work in its entirety. Jointly authored by the very people whose research has done much to define the current state of argumentation theory and to point the way toward more general and unified future treatments, this book is an impressively authoritative contribution to the field.

Methods of Argumentation

Douglas Walton
Methods of Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Douglas Walton
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 321 pages
File Size : 45,5 Mb
Release : 2013-08-26
Category : Computers
ISBN : 9781107039308

Get Book

Methods of Argumentation by Douglas Walton Pdf

This book, written by a leading expert, and based on the latest research, shows how to apply methods of argumentation to a range of examples.

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation

Frans H. van Eemeren,Robert Grootendorst,Rob Grootendorst
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation Book PDF

Author : Frans H. van Eemeren,Robert Grootendorst,Rob Grootendorst
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 228 pages
File Size : 51,6 Mb
Release : 2004
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 052153772X

Get Book

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation by Frans H. van Eemeren,Robert Grootendorst,Rob Grootendorst Pdf

In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.

Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics

Eveline T. Feteris,Bart Garssen,A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Keeping in touch with Pragma Dialectics Book PDF

Author : Eveline T. Feteris,Bart Garssen,A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing
Page : 291 pages
File Size : 55,6 Mb
Release : 2011-05-12
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9789027287038

Get Book

Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics by Eveline T. Feteris,Bart Garssen,A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans Pdf

Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics is written to honor Frans van Eemeren and his work in the field of argumentation theory on the occasion of his retirement. The volume contains 17 contributions from teams of authors consisting of a combination of a pragma-dialectician and one or two researchers with a different background in the field of argumentation. In this volume, comparisons between the pragma-dialectical approach and other approaches are made, aspects of strategic maneuvering such as the use of presentational techniques, adaptation to the audience and the selection of topics are dealt with and the influence of specific institutional contexts such as politics, medicine and internet forums on strategic maneuvering are discussed.

Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

Peter McBurney,Iyad Rahwan,Simon D. Parsons,Nicolas Maudet
Argumentation in Multi Agent Systems Book PDF

Author : Peter McBurney,Iyad Rahwan,Simon D. Parsons,Nicolas Maudet
Publisher : Springer
Page : 321 pages
File Size : 55,7 Mb
Release : 2010-05-09
Category : Computers
ISBN : 9783642128059

Get Book

Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems by Peter McBurney,Iyad Rahwan,Simon D. Parsons,Nicolas Maudet Pdf

This book constitutes the thoroughly refereed proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, held in Budapest, Hungary, in May 2009, in association with the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2009). The 18 revised full papers were carefully reviewed and selected from numerous submissions and are organized in four topical sections on practical reasoning and argument about action; persuasion and negotiation; argumentation theory; and applications and emotions.

Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning

Douglas Walton
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning Book PDF

Author : Douglas Walton
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 233 pages
File Size : 40,5 Mb
Release : 2013-11-05
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781136687068

Get Book

Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning by Douglas Walton Pdf

Recent concerns with the evaluation of argumentation in informal logic and speech communication center around nondemonstrative arguments that lead to tentative or defeasible conclusions based on a balance of considerations. Such arguments do not appear to have structures of the kind traditionally identified with deductive and inductive reasoning, but are extremely common and are often called "plausible" or "presumptive," meaning that they are only provisionally acceptable even when they are correct. How is one to judge, by some clearly defined standard, whether such arguments are correct or not in a given instance? The answer lies in what are called argumentation schemes -- forms of argument (structures of inference) that enable one to identify and evaluate common types of argumentation in everyday discourse. This book identifies 25 argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning and matches a set of critical questions to each. These two elements -- the scheme and the questions -- are then used to evaluate a given argument in a particular case in relation to a context of dialogue in which the argument occurred. In recent writings on argumentation, there is a good deal of stress placed on how important argumentation schemes are in any attempt to evaluate common arguments in everyday reasoning as correct or fallacious, acceptable or questionable. However, the problem is that the literature thus far has not produced a precise and user-friendly enough analysis of the structures of the argumentation schemes themselves, nor have any of the documented accounts been as helpful, accessible, or systematic as they could be, especially in relation to presumptive reasoning. This book solves the problem by presenting the most common presumptive schemes in an orderly and clear way that makes them explicit and useful as precisely defined structures. As such, it will be an indispensable tool for researchers, students, and teachers in the areas of critical thinking, argumentation, speech communication, informal logic, and discourse analysis.