Judicial Review And The Constitution

Judicial Review And The Constitution Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Judicial Review And The Constitution book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.

Weak Courts, Strong Rights

Author : Mark Tushnet
Publisher : Princeton University Press
Page : 288 pages
File Size : 51,9 Mb
Release : 2009-07-20
Category : Political Science
ISBN : 9781400828159

Get Book

Weak Courts, Strong Rights by Mark Tushnet Pdf

Unlike many other countries, the United States has few constitutional guarantees of social welfare rights such as income, housing, or healthcare. In part this is because many Americans believe that the courts cannot possibly enforce such guarantees. However, recent innovations in constitutional design in other countries suggest that such rights can be judicially enforced--not by increasing the power of the courts but by decreasing it. In Weak Courts, Strong Rights, Mark Tushnet uses a comparative legal perspective to show how creating weaker forms of judicial review may actually allow for stronger social welfare rights under American constitutional law. Under "strong-form" judicial review, as in the United States, judicial interpretations of the constitution are binding on other branches of government. In contrast, "weak-form" review allows the legislature and executive to reject constitutional rulings by the judiciary--as long as they do so publicly. Tushnet describes how weak-form review works in Great Britain and Canada and discusses the extent to which legislatures can be expected to enforce constitutional norms on their own. With that background, he turns to social welfare rights, explaining the connection between the "state action" or "horizontal effect" doctrine and the enforcement of social welfare rights. Tushnet then draws together the analysis of weak-form review and that of social welfare rights, explaining how weak-form review could be used to enforce those rights. He demonstrates that there is a clear judicial path--not an insurmountable judicial hurdle--to better enforcement of constitutional social welfare rights.

Judicial Review and the Constitution

Author : Christopher Forsyth
Publisher : Bloomsbury Publishing
Page : 480 pages
File Size : 53,9 Mb
Release : 2000-05-01
Category : Law
ISBN : 9781847311870

Get Book

Judicial Review and the Constitution by Christopher Forsyth Pdf

This collection of essays presents opposing sides of the debate over the foundations of judicial review. In this work,however, the discussion of whether the 'ultra vires' doctrine is best characterised as a central principle of administrative law or as a harmless, justificatory fiction is located in the highly topical and political context of constitutional change. The thorough jurisprudential analysis of the relative merits of models of 'legislative intention' and 'judicial creativity' provides a sound base for consideration of the constitutional problems arising out of legislative devolution and the Human Rights Act 1998. As the historical orthodoxy is challenged by growing institutional independence, leading figures in the field offer competing perspectives on the future of judicial review. “Confucius was wrong to say that it is a curse to live in interesting times. We are witnessing the development of a constitutional philosophy which recognises fundamental values and gives them effect in the mediation of law to the people”. (Sir John Laws) Contributors Nick Bamforth, Paul Craig, David Dyzenhaus, Mark Elliott, David Feldman, Christopher Forsyth, Brigid Hadfield, Jeffrey Jowell QC, Sir John Laws, Dawn Oliver, Sir Stephen Sedley, Mark Walters. With short responses by: TRS Allan, Stephen Bailey, Robert Carnworth, Martin Loughlin, Michael Taggart, Sir William Wade.

The Doctrine of Judicial Review

Author : Edward S. Corwin
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 172 pages
File Size : 52,5 Mb
Release : 2017-07-05
Category : Law
ISBN : 9781351483490

Get Book

The Doctrine of Judicial Review by Edward S. Corwin Pdf

This book, first published in 1914, contains five historical essays. Three of them are on the concept of judicial review, which is defined as the power of a court to review and invalidate unlawful acts by the legislative and executive branches of government. One chapter addresses the historical controversy over states' rights. Another concerns the Pelatiah Webster Myth the notion that the US Constitution was the work of a single person.In "Marbury v. Madison and the Doctrine of Judicial Review," Edward S. Corwin analyzes the legal source of the power of the Supreme Court to review acts of Congress. "We, the People" examines the rights of states in relation to secession and nullification. "The Pelatiah Webster Myth" demolishes Hannis Taylor's thesis that Webster was the "secret" author of the constitution. "The Dred Scott Decision" considers Chief Justice Taney's argument concerning Scott's title to citizenship under the Constitution. "Some Possibilities in the Way of Treaty-Making" discusses how the US Constitution relates to international treaties.Matthew J. Franck's new introduction to this centennial edition situates Corwin's career in the history of judicial review both as a concept and as a political reality.

Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution

Author : Sylvia Snowiss
Publisher : Yale University Press
Page : 252 pages
File Size : 40,5 Mb
Release : 1990-01-01
Category : Law
ISBN : 0300046650

Get Book

Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution by Sylvia Snowiss Pdf

In this book, the author presents a new interpretation of the origin of judicial review. She traces the development of judicial review from American independence through the tenure of John Marshall as Chief Justice, showing that Marshall's role was far more innovative and decisive than has yet been recognized. According to the author all support for judicial review before Marshall contemplated a fundamentally different practice from that which we know today. Marshall did not simply reinforce or extend ideas already accepted but, in superficially minor and disguised ways, effected a radical transformation in the nature of the constitution and the judicial relationship to it.

Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective

Author : David M. Beatty
Publisher : BRILL
Page : 374 pages
File Size : 48,9 Mb
Release : 2021-09-27
Category : Law
ISBN : 9789004479401

Get Book

Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective by David M. Beatty Pdf

Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective collects, in one volume, a basic description of the most important principles and methods of analysis followed by the major Courts enforcing constitutional Bills of Rights around the world. The Courts include the Supreme Courts of Japan, India, Canada and the United States, the Constitutional Courts of Germany and Italy and the European Court of Human Rights. Each chapter is devoted to an analysis of the substantive jurisprudence developed by these Courts to determine whether a challenged law is constitutional or not, and is written by members of these Courts who have had a prior academic career. The book highlights the similarities and differences in the analytical methods used by these courts in determining whether or not someone's constitutional rights have been violated. Students and scholars of constitutional law and human rights, judges and advocates engaged in constitutional litigation will find the book a unique and valuable resource.

Judicial Review in the English-speaking World

Author : Edward McWhinney
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 228 pages
File Size : 48,7 Mb
Release : 1956
Category : Judicial review
ISBN : UCAL:$B155000

Get Book

Judicial Review in the English-speaking World by Edward McWhinney Pdf

Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court

Author : Kermit L. Hall
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 506 pages
File Size : 43,7 Mb
Release : 2014-07-22
Category : Law
ISBN : 9781135691530

Get Book

Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court by Kermit L. Hall Pdf

Available as a single volume or as part of the 10 volume set Supreme Court in American Society

Comparative Judicial Review

Author : Erin F. Delaney,Rosalind Dixon
Publisher : Edward Elgar Publishing
Page : 464 pages
File Size : 44,7 Mb
Release : 2018-09-28
Category : Law
ISBN : 9781788110600

Get Book

Comparative Judicial Review by Erin F. Delaney,Rosalind Dixon Pdf

Constitutional courts around the world play an increasingly central role in day-to-day democratic governance. Yet scholars have only recently begun to develop the interdisciplinary analysis needed to understand this shift in the relationship of constitutional law to politics. This edited volume brings together the leading scholars of constitutional law and politics to provide a comprehensive overview of judicial review, covering theories of its creation, mechanisms of its constraint, and its comparative applications, including theories of interpretation and doctrinal developments. This book serves as a single point of entry for legal scholars and practitioners interested in understanding the field of comparative judicial review in its broader political and social context.

Judicial Review in New Democracies

Author : Tom Ginsburg
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 322 pages
File Size : 51,7 Mb
Release : 2003-07-23
Category : Law
ISBN : 0521520398

Get Book

Judicial Review in New Democracies by Tom Ginsburg Pdf

New democracies around the world have adopted constitutional courts to oversee the operation of democratic politics. Where does judicial power come from, how does it develop in the early stages of democratic liberalization, and what political conditions support its expansion? This book answers these questions through an examination of three constitutional courts in Asia: Taiwan, Korea, and Mongolia. In a region that has traditionally viewed law as a tool of authoritarian rulers, constitutional courts in these three societies are becoming a real constraint on government. In contrast with conventional culturalist accounts, this book argues that the design and functioning of constitutional review are largely a function of politics and interests. Judicial review - the power of judges to rule an act of a legislature or national leader unconstitutional - is a solution to the problem of uncertainty in constitutional design. By providing insurance to prospective electoral losers, judicial review can facilitate democracy.

The Canadian Constitution and the Courts

Author : Barry L. Strayer
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 310 pages
File Size : 44,7 Mb
Release : 1983
Category : Canada
ISBN : 0409870765

Get Book

The Canadian Constitution and the Courts by Barry L. Strayer Pdf

Judicial Review

Author : Edward McWhinney
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 296 pages
File Size : 41,9 Mb
Release : 1969
Category : Law
ISBN : UOM:49015000221615

Get Book

Judicial Review by Edward McWhinney Pdf

First-3d ed. published under title: Judicial review in the English-speaking world.

Democracy and Distrust

Author : John Hart Ely
Publisher : Harvard University Press
Page : 281 pages
File Size : 42,8 Mb
Release : 1981-08-15
Category : Law
ISBN : 9780674263291

Get Book

Democracy and Distrust by John Hart Ely Pdf

This powerfully argued appraisal of judicial review may change the face of American law. Written for layman and scholar alike, the book addresses one of the most important issues facing Americans today: within what guidelines shall the Supreme Court apply the strictures of the Constitution to the complexities of modern life? Until now legal experts have proposed two basic approaches to the Constitution. The first, “interpretivism,” maintains that we should stick as closely as possible to what is explicit in the document itself. The second, predominant in recent academic theorizing, argues that the courts should be guided by what they see as the fundamental values of American society. John Hart Ely demonstrates that both of these approaches are inherently incomplete and inadequate. Democracy and Distrust sets forth a new and persuasive basis for determining the role of the Supreme Court today. Ely’s proposal is centered on the view that the Court should devote itself to assuring majority governance while protecting minority rights. “The Constitution,” he writes, “has proceeded from the sensible assumption that an effective majority will not unreasonably threaten its own rights, and has sought to assure that such a majority not systematically treat others less well than it treats itself. It has done so by structuring decision processes at all levels in an attempt to ensure, first, that everyone’s interests will be represented when decisions are made, and second, that the application of those decisions will not be manipulated so as to reintroduce in practice the sort of discrimination that is impermissible in theory.” Thus, Ely’s emphasis is on the procedural side of due process, on the preservation of governmental structure rather than on the recognition of elusive social values. At the same time, his approach is free of interpretivism’s rigidity because it is fully responsive to the changing wishes of a popular majority. Consequently, his book will have a profound impact on legal opinion at all levels—from experts in constitutional law, to lawyers with general practices, to concerned citizens watching the bewildering changes in American law.

Court Over Constitution

Author : Edward Samuel Corwin
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 296 pages
File Size : 52,8 Mb
Release : 1957
Category : Constitutional history
ISBN : STANFORD:36105007517605

Get Book

Court Over Constitution by Edward Samuel Corwin Pdf

Constitutional Deliberation in Congress

Author : J. Mitchell Pickerill
Publisher : Duke University Press
Page : 203 pages
File Size : 55,9 Mb
Release : 2004-05-17
Category : Law
ISBN : 9780822385677

Get Book

Constitutional Deliberation in Congress by J. Mitchell Pickerill Pdf

In Constitutional Deliberation in Congress J. Mitchell Pickerill analyzes the impact of the Supreme Court’s constitutional decisions on Congressional debates and statutory language. Based on a thorough examination of how Congress responds to key Court rulings and strategizes in anticipation of them, Pickerill argues that judicial review—or the possibility of it—encourages Congressional attention to constitutional issues. Revealing critical aspects of how laws are made, revised, and refined within the separated system of government of the United States, he makes an important contribution to “constitutionalism outside the courts” debates. Pickerill combines legislative histories, extensive empirical findings, and interviews with current and former members of Congress, congressional staff, and others. He examines data related to all of the federal legislation struck down by the Supreme Court from the beginning of the Warren Court in 1953 through the 1996–97 term of the Rehnquist Court. By looking at the legislative histories of Congressional acts that invoked the Commerce Clause and presented Tenth Amendment conflicts—such as the Child Labor Act (1916), the Civil Rights Act (1965), the Gun-Free School Zones Act (1990), and the Brady Bill (1994)—Pickerill illuminates how Congressional deliberation over newly proposed legislation is shaped by the possibility of judicial review. The Court’s invalidation of the Gun-Free School Zones Act in its 1995 ruling United States v. Lopez signaled an increased judicial activism regarding issues of federalism. Pickerill examines that case and compares congressional debate over constitutional issues in key pieces of legislation that preceded and followed it: the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 and the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 1997. He shows that Congressional attention to federalism increased in the 1990s along with the Court’s greater scrutiny.

Limiting Rights

Author : Janet Hiebert
Publisher : McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP
Page : 206 pages
File Size : 51,8 Mb
Release : 1996
Category : Law
ISBN : 0773514376

Get Book

Limiting Rights by Janet Hiebert Pdf

Limiting Rights is an in-depth exploration of who is, and who should be, responsible for determining whether legislation that conflicts with the entrenched rights of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms should nevertheless be upheld as a reasonable limit on protected rights. Janet Hiebert addresses a topic that threatens to undermine claims that what courts do can be distinguished from the discretionary decisions of policy makers and raises concerns about whether judicial review of the Charter is consistent with democratic principles.