Precedents As Rules And Practice Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Precedents As Rules And Practice book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
Precedents as Rules and Practice by Amalie Frese,Julius Schumann Pdf
This book brings together contributions with different approaches to the study of precedent as both 'rules' and 'practice'. The questions asked are thus not limited to whether precedent is defined by its constraining effect, but furthermore the contributions often concern the functions and roles of precedent through research questions such as: What is precedent when studying the practice of judicial decision making? How are precedents formed by adjudication and conversely, what role do precedent citations play for shaping judicial decisions and the outcomes? To what extent are precedents used in different systems of law and in different court's jurisprudence? When and for what are precedents used? And what different effects do different styles of precedent have and why?
Bryan A. Garner,Carlos Tiburcio Bea,Rebecca White Berch,Neil McGill Gorsuch,Harris L Hartz,Nathan L. Hecht,Brett Kavanaugh,Alex Kozinski,Sandra Lea Lynch,William H. Pryor (Jr.),Thomas Morrow Reavley,Jeffrey Stuart Sutton,Diane P. Wood
Author : Bryan A. Garner,Carlos Tiburcio Bea,Rebecca White Berch,Neil McGill Gorsuch,Harris L Hartz,Nathan L. Hecht,Brett Kavanaugh,Alex Kozinski,Sandra Lea Lynch,William H. Pryor (Jr.),Thomas Morrow Reavley,Jeffrey Stuart Sutton,Diane P. Wood Publisher : Unknown Page : 0 pages File Size : 52,7 Mb Release : 2016 Category : Judicial process ISBN : 0314634207
The Law of Judicial Precedent by Bryan A. Garner,Carlos Tiburcio Bea,Rebecca White Berch,Neil McGill Gorsuch,Harris L Hartz,Nathan L. Hecht,Brett Kavanaugh,Alex Kozinski,Sandra Lea Lynch,William H. Pryor (Jr.),Thomas Morrow Reavley,Jeffrey Stuart Sutton,Diane P. Wood Pdf
The Law of Judicial Precedent is the first hornbook-style treatise on the doctrine of precedent in more than a century. It is the product of 13 distinguished coauthors, 12 of whom are appellate judges whose professional work requires them to deal with precedents daily. Together with their editor and coauthor, Bryan A. Garner, the judges have thoroughly researched and explored the many intricacies of the doctrine as it guides the work of American lawyers and judges. The treatise is organized into nine major topics, comprising 93 blackletter sections that elucidate all the major doctrines relating to how past decisions guide future ones in our common-law system. The authors' goal was to make the book theoretically sound, historically illuminating, and relentlessly practical. The breadth and depth of research involved in producing the book will be immediately apparent to anyone who browses its pages and glances over the footnotes: it would have been all but impossible for any single author to canvass the literature so comprehensively and then distill the concepts so cohesively into a single authoritative volume. More than 2,500 illustrative cases discussed or cited in the text illuminate the points covered in each section and demonstrate the law's development over several centuries. The cases are explained in a clear, commonsense way, making the book accessible to anyone seeking to understand the role of precedents in American law. Never before have so many eminent coauthors produced a single lawbook without signed sections, but instead writing with a single voice. Whether you are a judge, a lawyer, a law student, or even a nonlawyer curious about how our legal system works, you're sure to find enlightening, helpful, and sometimes surprising insights into our system of justice.
Precedents as Rules and Practice by Amalie Frese,Julius Schumann Pdf
This book brings together contributions with different approaches to the study of precedent as both 'rules' and 'practice'. The questions asked are thus not limited to whether precedent is defined by its constraining effect, but furthermore the contributions often concern the functions and roles of precedent through research questions such as: What is precedent when studying the practice of judicial decision making? How are precedents formed by adjudication and conversely, what role do precedent citations play for shaping judicial decisions and the outcomes? To what extent are precedents used in different systems of law and in different court's jurisprudence? When and for what are precedents used? And what different effects do different styles of precedent have and why?
Precedents as Rules and Practice by Amalie Frese,Julius Schumann Pdf
Präjudizien haben heute in den unterschiedlichsten Rechtssystemen eine erhebliche Bedeutung für die juristische Entscheidungsfindung. Umso mehr besteht daher das Bedürfnis, deren Entstehungsbedingungen und deren tatsächlichen Einfluss auf die Praxis zu verstehen. Neben dogmatischen Arbeiten wurden in den letzten Jahren vermehrt Studien publiziert, die mit empirischen Methoden sowie sozialwissenschaftlichen Perspektiven der Praxis nationaler wie auch internationaler Gerichte näherkommen wollten. Das gab Anlass verschiedene theoriebezogene wie auch empirische Forschungszugänge, die im Zuge einer Konferenz präsentiert wurden, gemeinsam in einem Buch zu verbinden. So bietet das Buch unter anderem eine Analyse des Einflusses der linguistischen Praxis auf die Entscheidungsbegründungen des EuGH, die Erstellung eines Zitationsnetzwerks sowie ganz generell die Diskussion über den Wert neuer Methoden und Perspektiven in der Arbeit mit und der Forschung zu Präjudizien.
Precedent in English Law by Rupert Cross,J. W. Harris Pdf
This fourth edition of Precedent in English Law presents a basic guide to the current doctrine of precedent in England, set in the wider context of the jurisprudential problems which any treatment of this topic involves. Such problems include the nature of _ratio_ _decidendi_ of a precedent and of its binding force, the significance of precedents alongside other sources of law, their role in legal reasoning, and the account which must be taken of them by any general theory of law. Considerable re-writing has been undertaken to update case-law and take account of the possible implications for the doctrine of precedent of the impact of European Community law, making it an indispensable work of reference for readers interested in the past history, present state, and future developments of English rules of precedent.
It has been said that precedent is the life blood of legal systems. Certainly, an understanding of precedent is vital to an understanding of the workings of law. The principle that decisions should follow those of past similar cases seems simple enough, yet it turns out to be beset with difficulties. What is the justification for following precedents? Do we want absolute, unswerving following of past decisions or a weaker implementation that allows for limited departures? What social and theoretical forces wrought changes in the doctrine? Are judicial pronouncements on precedent rules or just conventions? How do we identify the ratio decidendi of a case? What are the means by which a general "projectable" conclusion may be elicited from a particular judgment? These are some of the problems addressed by contributors to this volume.
Encyclopedia of Forms and Precedents for Pleading and Practice, at Common Law, in Equity, and Under the Various Codes and Practice Acts by William Henry Michael,William Mack,Howard Pervear Nash,Thomas Edward O'Brien,James Cockcroft Pdf
Precedents and Notes of Practice in Civil Cases in the Higher Courts of Law of the State of New Jersey by Oscar Jeffery,Edward Quinton Keasbey,Charles Louis Borgmeyer Pdf
Encyclopedia of Forms and Precedents for Pleading and Practice by William Henry Michael,William Mack,Howard Pervear Nash,Thomas Edward O'Brien,James Cockroft Pdf
The author connects the vast social science data and legal scholarship to provide a wide-ranging assessment of precedent. He outlines the major issues in the continuing debates on the significance of precedent and evenly considers all sides.
