Argumentation In Political Interviews

Argumentation In Political Interviews Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Argumentation In Political Interviews book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.

Argumentation in Political Interviews

Author : Corina Andone
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing
Page : 157 pages
File Size : 48,9 Mb
Release : 2013-07-17
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9789027271754

Get Book

Argumentation in Political Interviews by Corina Andone Pdf

In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians’ responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of winning the discussion. In addition, the soundness criteria are formulated for judging properly when the politicians’ responses are indeed reasonable.This book is important to argumentation theorists, discourse analysts, communication scholars and all other researchers and students interested in the way in which language is used for the purpose of persuasion in a political context. Corina Andone is Assistant Professor of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric at the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands.

Political Argumentation in the United States

Author : David Zarefsky
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing Company
Page : 397 pages
File Size : 44,8 Mb
Release : 2014-09-15
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9789027269904

Get Book

Political Argumentation in the United States by David Zarefsky Pdf

In the United States, political argumentation occurs in institutionalized settings and the broader public forum, in efforts to resolve conflict and efforts to foster it, in settings with time limits and controversies that extend over centuries. From the ratification of the U.S. Constitution to the presidency of Barack Obama, this book contains twenty studies of U.S. political argumentation, grouped under four themes: early American political discourse, Abraham Lincoln’s political argumentation, argumentation about foreign policy, and public policy argumentation since the 1960s. Deploying methods of rhetorical criticism, argument analysis and evaluation, the studies are rich in contextual grounding and critical perspective. They integrate the European emphasis on politics as an argumentative context with the U.S. tradition of public address studies. Two essays have never before been published. The others are retrieved from journals and books published between 1979 and 2014. The introductory essay is new for this volume.

Argumentation in Political Deliberation

Author : Marcin Lewiński,Dima Mohammed
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing Company
Page : 178 pages
File Size : 51,6 Mb
Release : 2015-07-15
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9789027268273

Get Book

Argumentation in Political Deliberation by Marcin Lewiński,Dima Mohammed Pdf

The goal of this volume is to further the examination of the role, shape, and quality of argumentation in political deliberation. The chapters collected in the volume employ the concepts and methods developed within argumentation theory to investigate the specifics of political discourse across various deliberative arenas: from debates in the European Parliament, consensus conferences and public hearings in France, discussions in Dutch online forums, to exchanges of comments in online versions of British newspapers. In this way, the studies reveal the inner workings of argumentative interactions that constitute deliberative discourse – and thus importantly contribute to the study of public deliberation. This should be of interest to the students of argumentation, deliberation, and political discourse. In addition, the volume problematizes and theorizes some vital issues related to the study of situated argumentation, thus advancing the study of argumentation in context. Originally published in Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 2:1 (2013).

Political Discourse Analysis

Author : Isabela Fairclough,Norman Fairclough
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 282 pages
File Size : 49,7 Mb
Release : 2013-06-17
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781136490279

Get Book

Political Discourse Analysis by Isabela Fairclough,Norman Fairclough Pdf

In this accessible new textbook, Isabela and Norman Fairclough present their innovative approach to analysing political discourse. Political Discourse Analysis integrates analysis of arguments into critical discourse analysis and political discourse analysis. The book is grounded in a view of politics in which deliberation, decision and action are crucial concepts: politics is about arriving cooperatively at decisions about what to do in the context of disagreement, conflict of interests and values, power inequalities, uncertainty and risk. The first half of the book introduces the authors’ new approach to the analysis and evaluation of practical arguments, while the second half explores how it can be applied by looking at examples such as government reports, parliamentary debates, political speeches and online discussion forums on political issues. Through the analysis of current events, including a particular focus on the economic crisis and political responses to it, the authors provide a systematic and rigorous analytical framework that can be adopted and used for students’ own research. This exciting new text, co-written by bestselling author Norman Fairclough, is essential reading for researchers, upper undergraduate and postgraduate students of discourse analysis, within English language, linguistics, communication studies, politics and other social sciences.

The Language of Persuasion in Politics

Author : Alan Partington,Charlotte Taylor
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 263 pages
File Size : 45,6 Mb
Release : 2017-09-27
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781351710107

Get Book

The Language of Persuasion in Politics by Alan Partington,Charlotte Taylor Pdf

This accessible introductory textbook looks at the modern relationship between politicians, the press and the public through the language they employ, with extensive coverage of key topics including: ‘spin’, ‘spin control’ and ‘image’ politics models of persuasion: authority, contrast, association pseudo-logical and ‘post-truth’ arguments political interviewing: difficult questions, difficult answers metaphors and metonymy rhetorical figures humour, irony and satire Extracts from speeches, soundbites, newspapers and blogs, interviews, press conferences, election slogans, social media and satires are used to provide the reader with the tools to discover the beliefs, character and hidden strategies of the would-be persuader, as well as the counter-strategies of their targets. This book demonstrates how the study of language use can help us appreciate, exploit and protect ourselves from the art of persuasion. With a wide variety of practical examples on both recent issues and historically significant ones, every topic is complemented with guiding tasks, queries and exercises with keys and commentaries at the end of each unit. This is the ideal textbook for all introductory courses on language and politics, media language, rhetoric and persuasion, discourse studies and related areas.

Argumentation across Communities of Practice

Author : Cornelia Ilie,Giuliana Garzone
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing Company
Page : 353 pages
File Size : 55,7 Mb
Release : 2017-11-15
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9789027265173

Get Book

Argumentation across Communities of Practice by Cornelia Ilie,Giuliana Garzone Pdf

Featuring multidisciplinary and transcultural investigations, this volume showcases state-of-the-art scholarship about the impact of argumentation-based discourses and field-specific argumentation practices in a wide range of communities of practice belonging to the media, social, legal and political spheres. The investigations make use of integrative, wide-ranging theoretical perspectives and empirical research methodologies with a focus on argumentation strategies in real-life environments, both private and public, and in constantly growing virtual environments. This book brings together linguists, argumentation scholars, philosophers and communication specialists who convincingly show how interpersonal and/or intergroup interactions shape, challenge or change the argumentative practices of users, what argumentation skills and strategies become critical and consequential, how argumentative discourse contexts may stimulate or prevent critical reflection and debate, and what are the wider implications at personal, institutional and societal levels. Reaching beyond the boundaries of linguistics and argumentation sciences, this book should be a valuable resource for researchers as well as practitioners in the fields of pragmatic linguistics, argumentation studies, rhetoric, discourse analysis, political sciences and media studies.

The Linguistics of Political Argument

Author : Alan Partington
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 288 pages
File Size : 43,5 Mb
Release : 2003-08-29
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781134446216

Get Book

The Linguistics of Political Argument by Alan Partington Pdf

This book examines the relationship between the White House, in the person of its press secretary, and the press corps through a linguistic analysis of the language used by both sides. A corpus was compiled of around fifty press briefings from the late Clinton years. A wide range of topics are discussed from the Kosovo crisis to the Clinton-Lewinsky affair. This work is highly original in demonstrating how concordance technology and the detailed linguistic evidence available in corpora can be used to study discourse features of text and the communicative strategies of speakers. It will be of vital interest to all linguists interested in corpus-based linguistics and pragmatics, as well as sociolinguists and students and scholars of communications, politics and the media.

Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation

Author : Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton
Publisher : Springer
Page : 203 pages
File Size : 43,9 Mb
Release : 2017-09-06
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9783319625454

Get Book

Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation by Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton Pdf

This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be connected through argumentation to analyze a recognizably common strategy used in political and everyday conversation, namely the distortion of another’s words in an argumentative exchange. Straw man argumentation refers to the modification of a position by misquoting, misreporting or wrenching the original speaker’s statements from their context in order to attack them more easily or more effectively. Through 63 examples taken from different contexts (including political and forensic discourses and dialogs) and 20 legal cases, the book analyzes the explicit and implicit types of straw man, shows how to assess the correctness of a quote or a report, and illustrates the arguments that can be used for supporting an interpretation and defending against a distortion. The tools of argumentation theory, a discipline aimed at investigating the uses of arguments by combining insights from pragmatics, logic, and communication, are applied to provide an original account of interpretation and reporting, and to describe and illustrate tactics and procedures that can be used and implemented for practical purposes.. This book will appeal to scholars in the fields of political communication, communication in general, argumentation theory, rhetoric and pragmatics, as well as to people working in public speech, speech writing, and discourse analysis.

The Pragmatics of Cogent Argumentation in British and American Political Debates

Author : Waleed Ridha Hammoodi Al-Juwaid
Publisher : Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Page : 444 pages
File Size : 51,9 Mb
Release : 2019-03-05
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781527530669

Get Book

The Pragmatics of Cogent Argumentation in British and American Political Debates by Waleed Ridha Hammoodi Al-Juwaid Pdf

Since the time of Aristotle, various approaches have been offered to tackle what makes language stronger. Some approaches have focused on rhetoric, while others have given attention to logic. Still others have concentrated on dialectics. This book takes into account a full-fledged comprehensive model of analysis that brings these three perspectives together. Throughout, it investigates the presence of pragmatic criteria and the utilization of pragmatic strategies that make language stronger in the context of argumentation. Cogent argumentation is a pragmatic communicative interactional process that goes through stages, and is regarded as a communicative exchange of arguments. The cogency of these arguments is attained according to the availability of pragmatic criteria and the utilization of pragmatic strategies, and determined throughout the whole process of argumentation. The book will be of interest to anyone interested in the fields of pragmatics, communication, and politics, and will widen their understanding of the pragmatic structure and criteria which constitute cogent argumentation.

Fact-Checking Journalism and Political Argumentation

Author : Jen Birks
Publisher : Springer Nature
Page : 116 pages
File Size : 45,7 Mb
Release : 2019-11-15
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9783030305734

Get Book

Fact-Checking Journalism and Political Argumentation by Jen Birks Pdf

This timely book examines the role of fact-checking journalism within political policy debates, and its potential contribution to public engagement. Understanding facts not to operate in a political vacuum, the book argues for a wide remit for fact-checking journalism beyond empirically-checkable facts, to include the causal relationships and predictions that form part of wider political arguments and are central to electoral pledges. Whilst these statements cannot be proven or disproven, fact-checking can, and sometimes does, ask pertinent critical questions about the premises of those claims and arguments. The analysis centres on the three dedicated national British fact-checkers during the UK’s 2017 snap general election, including their activity and engagement on Twitter. The book also makes a close political discourse and argumentation analysis of three key issue debates in flagship reporting from Channel 4 News and the BBC.

Why We Argue (And How We Should)

Author : Scott F. Aikin,Robert B. Talisse
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 139 pages
File Size : 47,5 Mb
Release : 2013-11-12
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 9781135123369

Get Book

Why We Argue (And How We Should) by Scott F. Aikin,Robert B. Talisse Pdf

Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one’s individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one’s society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy. Written in a lively style and filled with examples drawn from the real world of contemporary politics, and questions following each chapter to encourage discussion, Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement reads like a guide for the participation in, and maintenance of, modern democracy. An excellent student resource for courses in critical thinking, political philosophy, and related fields, Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement is an important contribution to reasoned debate.

Examining Argumentation in Context

Author : Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher : John Benjamins Publishing
Page : 318 pages
File Size : 42,6 Mb
Release : 2009-06-11
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 9789027289322

Get Book

Examining Argumentation in Context by Frans H. van Eemeren Pdf

Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering contains a selection of papers on strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Starting point of all of these contributions is that a satisfactory analysis and evaluation of strategic maneuvering is possible only if the argumentative discourse is first situated in the communicative and interactional context in which it occurs. While some of the contributions present general views with regard to strategic maneuvering, other contributions report on the results of empirical studies, examine strategic maneuvering in a particular legal or political context, or highlight the presentational design of strategic maneuvering. Examining Argumentation in Context therefore provides an insightful view of recent developments in the research on strategic maneuvering, which is currently prominent in the study of argumentation.

Why We Argue (And How We Should)

Author : Scott F. Aikin,Robert B. Talisse
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 218 pages
File Size : 42,6 Mb
Release : 2018-09-03
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 9781351616232

Get Book

Why We Argue (And How We Should) by Scott F. Aikin,Robert B. Talisse Pdf

Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one’s individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one’s society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy. Written in a lively style and filled with examples drawn from the real world of contemporary politics, and questions following each chapter to encourage discussion, Why We Argue (And How We Should) reads like a guide for the participation in, and maintenance of, modern democracy. An excellent student resource for courses in critical thinking, political philosophy, and related fields, Why We Argue (And How We Should) is an important contribution to reasoned debate. What’s New in the Second Edition: Updated examples throughout the book, including examples from the 2016 U.S. election and first years of the Trump presidency; Expanded coverage of dialectical fallacies, including coverage of new types of fallacies and of sites where such fallacies thrive (e.g., cable news, social media); Revised For Further Thought questions and definitions of Key Terms, included at the end of each chapter; The addition of five new chapters: Deep Disagreement Argument by Analogy Argument between the Ads The Owl of Minerva (or weaponizing metalanguage) Argumentative Responsibility and Repair.

Belligerent Broadcasting

Author : Michael Higgins,Angela Smith
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 320 pages
File Size : 49,8 Mb
Release : 2016-09-13
Category : Social Science
ISBN : 9781317175292

Get Book

Belligerent Broadcasting by Michael Higgins,Angela Smith Pdf

Why is rudeness such a prominent feature of contemporary broadcasting? If broadcasting is about the enactment of sociability, then how can we account for the fact that broadcasting has become a sphere of anger, humiliation, anger, dispute and upset? And to what extent does belligerence in broadcasting reflect broader social and cultural developments? This book reflects upon and analyses the development of 'belligerent broadcasting' beginning with an examination of belligerence in its historical context and as an aspect of wider cultural concerns surrounding the retreat of civility. With attention to the various relations of power expressed in the various forms of belligerent conduct across a range of media genres, the authors explore its manifestation in political interviews, in the form of 'confrontation' in talk shows, in makeover television, as an 'authentic' means of proffering opinion and as a form of sociability or banter. Richly illustrated with studies and examples of well-known shows from both sides of the Atlantic, including The Apprentice, The Fixer, American Idol, Gordon Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares, DIY SOS, The Jeremy Kyle Show and Dragon's Den, this book reflects on the consequences and potentialities of belligerence in the media and public sphere. It will appeal to scholars and students of cultural and media studies, communication and popular culture.

Decoding Political Discourse

Author : Maria-Ionela Neagu
Publisher : Springer
Page : 214 pages
File Size : 44,5 Mb
Release : 2013-02-06
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN : 9781137309907

Get Book

Decoding Political Discourse by Maria-Ionela Neagu Pdf

This book provides an in-depth look into the cognitive and argumentative nature of political discourse with a focus on the role and place of conceptual metaphors in practical argumentation. Neagu's empirical investigation centres on the corpus of the American Presidential debates in 2008 and speeches by Barack Obama from 2009-2011.