Download Full eBooks in PDF
Examination Of The Force Requirements Determination Process Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Examination Of The Force Requirements Determination Process book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
Author : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Military Personnel
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 104 pages
File Size : 48,9 Mb
Release : 2008
Category : Business & Economics
ISBN : PSU:000065514092
Author : Us Department Of Defense,www.survivalebooks.com,Department of Defense,Delene Kvasnicka,United States Government US Army,United States Army,Department of the Army,U. S. Army,Army,DOD,The United States Army
Publisher : Delene Kvasnicka www.survivalebooks.com
Page : 128 pages
File Size : 46,8 Mb
Release : 2024-07-03
Category : Reference
ISBN : 8210379456XXX
AR 73-1 08/01/2006 TEST AND EVALUATION POLICY , Survival Ebooks
Author : United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 44 pages
File Size : 46,6 Mb
Release : 2001
Category : Electronic
ISBN : STANFORD:36105126830350
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 18 pages
File Size : 55,8 Mb
Release : 2002
Category : Electronic
ISBN : OCLC:1049811671
In May 2000, the Air Force initiated an assessment to test whether the force requirements derived from its manpower requirements determination process were sufficient to support the spectrum of military operations envisioned in the defense strategy: from simultaneously fighting two major theater wars to conducting multiple contingency operations in peacetime. This assessment, called the Total Force Assessment, was the Air Forces first evaluation of manpower adequacy in these contexts since 1995. Past assessments have been done on an irregular basis. In addition to assessing whether the Air Force could support the envisioned wartime and peacetime military operations, the most recent Total Force Assessment was generally expected to provide information to assist Air Force leadership in other force-management and decision-making processes. For example, the Air Force anticipated that Total Force Assessment results might be used to assess the appropriateness of its force mix, provide additional support for budgetary submissions, and provide data for day-to-day management of manpower assets.
Author : United States. Defense Logistics Studies Information Exchange
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 432 pages
File Size : 46,9 Mb
Release : 1972
Category : Military research
ISBN : MINN:31951D03790601A
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 420 pages
File Size : 45,8 Mb
Release : 1984
Category : Administrative agencies
ISBN : UCR:31210024856864
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 60 pages
File Size : 51,7 Mb
Release : 2002-05
Category : Finance, Public
ISBN : UIUC:30112079535339
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 248 pages
File Size : 46,6 Mb
Release : 1984
Category : Military art and science
ISBN : WISC:89128473519
Author : United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Defense
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 292 pages
File Size : 53,9 Mb
Release : 1990
Category : United States
ISBN : IND:30000088104223
Author : United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 1116 pages
File Size : 54,7 Mb
Release : 1990
Category : Electronic
ISBN : LOC:00183578923
Author : United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Defense
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 294 pages
File Size : 55,7 Mb
Release : 1990
Category : United States
ISBN : UOM:39015040594007
Author : United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 32 pages
File Size : 46,8 Mb
Release : 1988
Category : Armed Forces
ISBN : UIUC:30112033972958
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 134 pages
File Size : 52,6 Mb
Release : 1999
Category : Electronic
ISBN : UIUC:30112101047972
Author : United States. Defense Logistics Studies Information Exchange
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 318 pages
File Size : 53,9 Mb
Release : 1989
Category : Military research
ISBN : MINN:31951T00248987V
Author : Anonim
Publisher : DIANE Publishing
Page : 273 pages
File Size : 43,7 Mb
Release : 2005
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9781428931596
On May 13, 2005, the Secretary of Defense submitted proposed base realignment and closure (BRAC) actions to an independent commission for its review. The Commission must submit its recommendations to the President by September 8, 2005, for his acceptance or rejection in their entirety. Congress has final action to accept or reject these recommendations in their entirety later this year. The law required that GAO issue a report on the Department of Defense's (DoD) recommendations and selection process by July 1, 2005. GAO's objectives for this report were as follows: (1) determine the extent to which DoD's proposals achieved its stated BRAC goals, (2) analyze whether the process for developing recommendations was logical, and (3) identify issues with the recommendations that may warrant further attention. Time constraints limited GAO's ability to examine implementation details of most of the individual recommended actions. DoD had varying success in achieving its 2005 BRAC goals of reducing excess infrastructure and producing savings, furthering transformation, and fostering jointness. While DoD proposed a record number of closures and realignments, exceeding all prior BRAC rounds combined, many proposals focused on reserve bases and relatively few on closing active bases. Projected savings are almost equally large, but most savings are derived from 10 percent of the recommendations. While GAO believes savings would be achieved, overall up-front investment costs of an estimated $24 billion are required, and there are clear limitations associated with DoD's projection of nearly $50 billion in savings over a 20-year period. Much of the projected net annual recurring savings (47 percent) is associated with eliminating jobs currently held by military personnel. However, rather than reducing end-strength levels, DoD indicates the positions are expected to be reassigned to other areas, which may enhance capabilities but also limit dollar savings available for other use7.