Download Full eBooks in PDF
Survey Of Us Higher Education Faculty 2023 Requesting The Library To Purchase New Materials Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Survey Of Us Higher Education Faculty 2023 Requesting The Library To Purchase New Materials book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 43,7 Mb
Release : 2023
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171
Author : Primary Research Group
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 52,5 Mb
Release : 2023-02-08
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171304
This 77-page report gives extensive and detailed data on who, how often, and for what kinds of materials, do faculty request that their academic libraries make purchases of new materials. The study also gives detailed data on just how often such requests are fulfilled and for whom, enabling readers of the study to compare effective fulfillment rates - for example - for male vs female faculty, or full professors vs. instructors or associate professors - or Caucasian vs. Asian origin faculty - or faculty in visual arts vs. those in economics or history. The study gives unique data sets for requests for each of the following types of materials; databases, journals and other periodicals, print books, eBooks, and audio-visual resources. For each type of resource, the study shows which faculty most often make requests, and 13 tables of data highlight demand for each type of resources. Just a few of this unique report's many findings are that: Faculty in history were the most likely to consider their library extremely responsive to their requests.The likelihood of requesting the library to purchase a print book was strongly positively correlated with the personal age of the respondent.Nearly 27% of tenured faculty had ever requested their library to order an eBook for them.Respondents at private colleges made more than twice the number of new materials requests per capita to their academic libraries than faculty from public colleges.This 77-page study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others.
Author : Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 47,6 Mb
Release : 2022-12-19
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171106
This study looks at the incidence and volume of faculty use of virtual reference services operated by academic libraries. Survey participants describe their use of virtual reference and their extent of familiarly with it. It also looks at the extent to which virtual reference acts as a gateway to other library services, including consultations with library subject specialists. Data in the report is based on a survey of 725 faculty at nearly 500 higher education institutions in the United States. Data is broken out by 12 personal and institutional variables including size, type or Carnegie class, tuition level and public/private status of the participant's affiliated institutions, as well as personal characteristics such as academic field, tenure status, academic title, gender, income and other variables.Just a few of this 53-page report's many findings are that:?69.24% of faculty surveyed have ever used the academic library virtual reference service.?Use of the virtual reference service was more common by females than by males.?Virtual reference opened new paths to the use of library resources especially for faculty aged 31 to 39. ?Broken out by race or ethnicity, African American faculty were the most likely to feel that there was a library subject specialist for their field (63.04%) while Hispanic faculty were the least likely (38.46%).
Author : Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 46,7 Mb
Release : 2023-01-31
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171281
This study looks at frequency of use of library photocopiers; it also provides data comparing library patron production of print and digital copies in academic libraries. The study also looks at the overall level of satisfaction with library photocopiers and scanners, furnishing data on how often they are used and by whom, enhancing the quality of decision making over their future placement, servicing and overall use. This 77-page study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Readers can compare the number of copies made by faculty in law or medicine to that in the social sciences, for example, or to business faculty. Also, use of library scanners by associate professors can be compared to that for full professors, or use by faculty aged 60 or over to that of faculty aged 31-39. Just a few of this report's many findings are that: ?8.93% of survey respondents save or otherwise make copies of digital materials from their academic libraries every day.?About 25% of faculty are only somewhat satisfied or dissatisfied with their academic library's photocopiers and related policies.?Faculty in law and education are the most avid users of library photocopiers.
Author : Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 46,6 Mb
Release : 2023-02-24
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171335
This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this 65-page report's many findings are that: ?Use of other institutions libraries was greatest among faculty in history and journalism, of which 73.68% and 76.92% of faculty respectively had used the academic library of another institution.?Faculty from BA-level institutions were more aware than those of other types of colleges and universities of the existence of resource-sharing agreements between their own and other institution's libraries.?By academic title, adjuncts were the least satisfied with resource-sharing arrangements.
Author : Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 45,7 Mb
Release : 2023-04-12
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171601
This study looks closely at the use of proxies by higher education faculty to retrieve items from or represent them at academic libraries. Such programs have become more popular in recent years as more faculty work remotely and visit the library less. Some libraires have found them useful in maintaining faculty links to the library, particularly to print and audio-visual items. The report gives detailed data on the percentage and type of faculty who have used such proxy programs, and the extent of their use. In addition, Just a few of the findings from this 43-page report are that: ?Older faculty tended to be more aware of this policy than younger ones; 68.01% of faculty over age 60 felt such a policy existed vs. only 46.67% of faculty under age 30.?Use was greater by faculty who considered themselves political conservatives than those on the left wing of the political spectrum. Data in the report is based on a survey of 954 higher education faculty from nearly 500 institutions; data is broken out by a broad range of personal and institutional variables including age, gender, work title, academic field, personal income level, type of higher education institution, and other useful variables.
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 54,9 Mb
Release : 2022
Category : Academic libraries
ISBN : 9798885171
This study looks at the incidence and volume of faculty use of virtual reference services operated by academic libraries. Survey participants describe their use of virtual reference and their extent of familiarly with it. It also looks at the extent to which virtual reference acts as a gateway to other library services, including consultations with library subject specialists. Data in the report is based on a survey of 725 faculty at nearly 500 higher education institutions in the United States. Data is broken out by 12 personal and institutional variables including size, type or Carnegie class, tuition level and public/private status of the participant's affiliated institutions, as well as personal characteristics such as academic field, tenure status, academic title, gender, income and other variables. Just a few of this 53-page report's many findings are that: 69.24% of faculty surveyed have ever used the academic library virtual reference service ; Use of the virtual reference service was more common by females than by males ; Virtual reference opened new paths to the use of library resources especially for faculty aged 31 to 39 ; Broken out by race or ethnicity, African American faculty were the most likely to feel that there was a library subject specialist for their field (63.04%) while Hispanic faculty were the least likely (38.46%). (---publisher's website)
Author : Primary Research Group
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 48,5 Mb
Release : 2022
Category : Electronic reference services (Libraries)
ISBN : 9798885171
This study looks at the incidence and volume of faculty use of virtual reference services operated by academic libraries. Survey participants describe their use of virtual reference and their extent of familiarly with it. It also looks at the extent to which virtual reference acts as a gateway to other library services, including consultations with library subject specialists. Data in the report is based on a survey of 725 faculty at nearly 500 higher education institutions in the United States. Data is broken out by 12 personal and institutional variables including size, type or Carnegie class, tuition level and public/private status of the participant's affiliated institutions, as well as personal characteristics such as academic field, tenure status, academic title, gender, income and other variables. Just a few of this 53-page report's many findings are that: 69.24% of faculty surveyed have ever used the academic library virtual reference service ; Use of the virtual reference service was more common by females than by males ; Virtual reference opened new paths to the use of library resources especially for faculty aged 31 to 39 ; Broken out by race or ethnicity, African American faculty were the most likely to feel that there was a library subject specialist for their field (63.04%) while Hispanic faculty were the least likely (38.46%). (---publisher's website)
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 46,7 Mb
Release : 2024-06-01
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 44,6 Mb
Release : 2023
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171
Author : Primary Research Group
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 41,7 Mb
Release : 2023-02-16
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171328
This 95-page study presents highly detailed data on just how comfortable faculty library patrons are in the academic library. It helps its readers to answer questions such as: what do faculty think of the library's current COVID control efforts? How about the noise level in the library? Is the air conditioning insufficient or excessive, or just about right? How clean is the library? Is it warm enough in the library building in winter? How about library bathrooms? What would make the library more comfortable? And, overall, just how comfortable is your academic library?The study helps its readers to get at the nitty gritty issues that often impact library use but about which little systematic information is available. This unique study fills the gap.Just a few of the many findings from this report are:79.4% of respondents felt that the temperature in the academic library in winter was about right.About 7% of female respondents felt that it was too cold in the library when the air conditioning was on.African-American and Hispanic faculty were more likely than their Caucasian or Asian-origin peers to feel that the library's current COVID policies were deficient.Data in the study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others.
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 41,6 Mb
Release : 2023
Category : Academic libraries
ISBN : 9798885171
"This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others." -- from publisher website
Author : Anonim
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 48,7 Mb
Release : 2023
Category : Academic libraries
ISBN : 9798885171
Author : Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 55,9 Mb
Release : 2023-01-09
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171229
Author : Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher : Unknown
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 41,5 Mb
Release : 2023-03
Category : Electronic
ISBN : 9798885171359
This study gives extensive data on how US higher education faculty use course reserves, particularly through their academic libraries. The study helps its readers to answer questions such as: which faculty use course reserves? How much? How satisfied are they with the services academic libraries provide for course reserves? Do they put print materials on course reserve? Digital materials? How easy is it to use course reserves? How easy is it to integrate course reserves with course management systems? What can be done to improve course reserve systems? This 70-page study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this report's many findings are that: 34.43% of adjunct faculty in the sample put materials on course reserve in the academic library. 37.22% of faculty felt it was very easy to put materials on course reserve. Faculty of Asian origin were much more likely than others to worry that they were abrogating copyright or licensing strictures when they put materials on course reserve. Faculty at the smallest colleges were particularly dissatisfied with the ease of integrating content on course reserve into course management systems.