Effective Peer Review Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Effective Peer Review book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
How to Conduct an Effective Peer Review by Gloria Barczak,Abbie Griffin Pdf
This crucial book guides academics and researchers through the process of peer reviewing manuscript articles, outlining the methods and proficiencies required to write a high-quality review. Gloria Barczak and Abbie Griffin specifically highlight the importance of becoming a first-rate reviewer to early career scholars.
Author : Robert J. Marder,Mark A. Smith,Richard A. Sheff Publisher : HC Pro, Inc. Page : 191 pages File Size : 52,7 Mb Release : 2007 Category : Business & Economics ISBN : 9781601460110
Effective Peer Review by Robert J. Marder,Mark A. Smith,Richard A. Sheff Pdf
HCPro is pleased to introduce Effective Peer Review: A Practical Guide to Contemporary Design, Second Edition, authored by The Greeley Company experts, Robert J. Marder, MD and Mark A. Smith, MD, MBA, FACS. Completely updated to help you: * Comply with The Joint Commission's 2007 standards * Deliver focused and ongoing professional practice evaluations * Evaluate physician core competencies * And much more! Peer review continues to rate as a top problematic issue and one you can't ignore. The pressure is driven by publicly available national data, The Joint Commission's 2007 standards expanding measurement of physician competence, and hospital boards' need to be assured that the peer review process is functioning effectively. Learn how to go beyond just satisfying a regulatory requirement to performing peer review that fosters true improvement within your facility. Although hospitals go through the motions of peer review, they are often unable to make it a meaningful process-one that results in true improvement in physician performance and meets The Joint Commission's standards. Transform your peer review process and meet external requirements with Effective Peer Review: A Practical Guide to Contemporary Design, Second Edition. Get best practices to make peer review worthwhile Newly updated and in high demand, Effective Peer Review, Second Edition, outlines and provides advice about how to do physician peer review effectively. Authored by experts from The Greeley Company, this book and CD-ROM goes beyond just reviewing the Joint Commission standards. It puts the standards in context by emphasizing best practices you can implement in your peer review process. Plus, you'll receive thorough discussion about data analysis and collection, along with peer review scoring and rating systems. Critical information at your fingertips Offering step-by-step guidance to peer review, this book and CD-ROM will help you: * Streamline your exist
Effective Peer Review The Complete Guide to Physician Performance Improvement, Third Edition Robert J. Marder, MD Peer review continues to rate as a top problematic issue in healthcare organizations. Even if they are meeting regulatory standards, most organizations struggle to develop a peer review program that is meaningful to physicians, causing them to become resistant to this performance measurement tool. This new edition explains the connection between peer review, OPPE, and FPPE. It also contains updated information on OPPE and FPPE as related to The Joint Commission''s standards. This book also incorporates three previous books: Effective Peer Review, Peer Review Best Practices, and Measuring Physician Competency. Now readers have one, all-encompassing resource to answer their peer review and physician performance questions. This completely updated book will help you: Engage physicians in the peer review process Create tools to recognize and celebrate excellence Design OPPE profiles and create a plan for distributing the information to physicians Eliminate bias and improve case reviewer efficiency Determine if your peer review policies comply with regulatory standards Take a look at the Table of Contents: Chapter 1: Peer Review: Why Do We Need to Measure Physician Competence? What Peer Review Is What Peer Review Is Not Who Is a Peer? Impartiality and Conflicts of interest Sham Peer Reviews The Duty to Perform Effective Peer Review Should Physicians Be Paid to Perform Peer Reviews? Chapter 2: From Punitive to Positive: Creating a Performance Improvement Culture for Peer Review How Can Culture Change? Values of a Performance Improvement-Focused Peer Review Culture Peer Review and the Just Culture Chapter 3: Legal Considerations: Impact of Regulations and Liability on Peer Review Redefining Peer Review: OPPE, FPPE, and the Core Competencies How the Standards Apply Peer Review Protection Laws Affirmative Duty to Keep Information Confidential Fair Hearings The National Practitioner Data Bank Negligent Peer Review Chapter 4: Peer Review Structures: The Impact of Multi-Specialty Peer Review Peer Review Structures: Three Primary Functions Goals for Peer Review Redesign Basic Peer Review Models Who Should Oversee Peer Review? Selecting the Right Model Physician Behavior: Who Should Handle It? Chapter 5: Measuring Physician Performance: What to Measure and How to Do It Fairly? What Is a Physician Performance Indicator? Indicator Validity: Selecting Physician-Driven Measures What Are You Required to Measure? What to Measure: Structure, Process, and Outcome How to Measure Physicians Fairly: Review, Rate, and Rule Indicators Understanding and Improving Risk- Adjusted Data Using Perception Data to Evaluate Physician Performance Case Study Indicator Selection Chapter 6: Case Review: Reducing Bias and Improving Reviewer Efficiency and Effectiveness Standardizing the Case Review Process Case Identification and Screening Physician Reviewer Assignment Physician Review and Initial Case Rating Initial Committee Review and Physician Input Committee Decision and Improvement Opportunity Identification Communication of Findings and Follow-Up Accountability Case Rating Systems Case Review and the Electronic Age Chapter 7: Selecting Physician-Driven Measures for OPPE: Understanding and Applying the Six Core Competencies ACGME, ABMS, and The Joint Commission: Where Did the Core Competencies Come From and How Are They Used? Alternative Frameworks to the Core Competencies Using the Competency Statement and Expectations to Drive Physician Performance Measures Applying the Core Competencies to OPPE Chapter 8: Physician Data Attribution: Making OPPE Data Meaningful to Individual Physicians Using Imprecise Data for OPPE Attribution and Case Review Improving Attribution for Process Measures Outcome Measure Attribution in a Multiple-Provider World Attribution and Patient Satisfaction Data Chapter 9: Evaluating OPPE Data: Using Benchmarks and Targets for FPPE and the Pursuit of Excellence Understanding Normative Data Interpreting OPPE Data for a Time Interval How to Set Indicator Targets Targets for Indicator Types Interpreting OPPE Data for Trends Chapter 10: From OPPE to FPPE: Creating Accountability for Physician Performance Improvement Accountability for FPPE Initiation, Monitoring, and Follow-Up Designing an Effective FPPE Plan Getting Physician Buy-In for Improvement Opportunities and FPPE What Happens If FPPE Fails? Chapter 11: OPPE Profiles and Physician Performance Feedback: Practical Principles for Competency Report Design and Distribution OPPE Profile and Physician Performance Feedback Report: What Is the Difference? Designing the Report Define the Principles: 10 Questions to Guide Your Design Create a Format That Reflects the Design Principles Preparing and Distributing Competency Data Reports Develop the Infrastructure and Support Materials Pilot-Test Your Design Create a Policy for Physician Competency Reports Chapter 12: External Peer Review in a Physician Improvement Culture EPR Uses The EPR Policy What Circumstances Typically Require EPR? Who Determines When EPR Is Needed? Who Will Select the Reviewer? How Will the Cases Be Selected? Who Will Review the EPR Report Findings? How Will the Results Be Used? Beyond Case-Based EPR: Physician Assessment Programs Chapter 13: Reporting Peer Review: What Does the Board Need to Know? Contemporary Board Accountabilities for Hospital Quality What Keeps the Board Awake at Night? Filling In the Knowledge Gap: Helping Boards Understand Physician Competency Measurement What Data Should the Board Get? Chapter 14: Running an Effective Peer Review Committee Meeting Elements of an Effective Meeting Role of the Committee Chair Responsibilities of Committee Members in Meeting Preparation and Management Practical Tips for Managing Committee Discussion to Avoid Wasting Physician Time Chapter 15: Beyond the Hospital Walls: Peer Review in Ambulatory Care and ACOs Why Would You Want to Do Peer Review in a Nonhospital Setting? Can You Do Peer Review in the Nonhospital Setting? What Data Can You Obtain From the Hospital and What Are You Willing to Share? Peer Review Outside the Hospital: How Should You Organize It? Peer Review Outside the Hospital: What Can You Measure? Chapter 16: Creating Effective Peer Review Policies and Procedures What Do Your Policies and Procedures Need to Cover? Redesigning Your Peer Review Program: A Step-by-Step Guide Should You Do This Yourself or Get Some Help?
Student-Led Peer Review by Kimberly A. Lowe,Liv Cummins,Summer Ray Clark,Bill Porter Pdf
Student-led peer review can be a powerful learning experience for both giver and receiver, developing evaluative judgment, critical thinking, and collaborative skills that are highly transferable across disciplines and professions. Its success depends on purposeful planning and scaffolding to promote student ownership of the process. With intentional and consistent implementation, peer review can engage students in course content and promote deep learning, while also increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of faculty assessment.Based on the authors’ extensive experience and research, this book provides a practical introduction to the key principles, steps, and strategies to implement student peer review – sometimes referred to as “peer critique” or “workshopping”. It addresses common challenges that faculty and students encounter. The authors offer an easy-to-follow and rigorously tested three-part protocol to use before, during, and after a peer review session, and advice on adapting each step to individual courses.The process is applicable across all disciplines, content types, and modalities, face-to-face and online, synchronous and asynchronous. Instructors can guide students in peer review in one course, across two or more courses that are team-taught, or across programs or curriculums. When instructors, students, and university stakeholders create a culture of peer review, it enhances learning benefits for students and allows faculty to share pedagogical resources.Student peer review is a high-impact pedagogy that’s easily implemented, inculcates lifelong learning skills in students, and relieves the assessment burden on faculty as students collaborate to improve their own work.
How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries? by Samiran Nundy,Atul Kakar,Zulfiqar A. Bhutta Pdf
This is an open access book. The book provides an overview of the state of research in developing countries – Africa, Latin America, and Asia (especially India) and why research and publications are important in these regions. It addresses budding but struggling academics in low and middle-income countries. It is written mainly by senior colleagues who have experienced and recognized the challenges with design, documentation, and publication of health research in the developing world. The book includes short chapters providing insight into planning research at the undergraduate or postgraduate level, issues related to research ethics, and conduct of clinical trials. It also serves as a guide towards establishing a research question and research methodology. It covers important concepts such as writing a paper, the submission process, dealing with rejection and revisions, and covers additional topics such as planning lectures and presentations. The book will be useful for graduates, postgraduates, teachers as well as physicians and practitioners all over the developing world who are interested in academic medicine and wish to do medical research.
With 80 percent new material, In the Middle, Third Edition brings Nancie Atwell's methods up to date. Nancie guides newcomers to a rich, satisfying practice while sharing her latest innovations and refinements with those who have made In the Middle their teaching touchstone.
Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies by Asao B. Inoue Pdf
In Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies, Asao B. Inoue theorizes classroom writing assessment as a complex system that is “more than” its interconnected elements. To explain how and why antiracist work in the writing classroom is vital to literacy learning, Inoue incorporates ideas about the white racial habitus that informs dominant discourses in the academy and other contexts.
Peer Review Benchmarking: Pursuing Medical Staff Excellence Robert J. Marder, MD Looking for metrics and real-world processes to assess your peer review program? Peer Review Benchmarking: Pursuing Medical Staff Excellenceoffers the tools you need to analyze and redesign your peer review processes. Learn how to quantify your peer review data to measure the success of peer review at your organization and how to best share this information with various departments and committees. Once you use the data to determine what elements of your peer review process you need to redesign, read the case studies in this book from organizations who embarked on peer review redesign and learn from their triumphs and mistakes. This book will help you improve your peer review program by: Integrating redesign of hospital peer review structures for fairness, efficiency, and effectiveness Reducing bias in case review and OPPE Enhancing organizational sharing of peer review information to improve patient care Determining the best structure for your peer review committee
Peer Review in Nursing by Barbara Haag-Heitman,Vicki George Pdf
Peer Review in Nursing: Principles for a Successful Practice is the first nursing publication that approaches the definition and implementation strategies for peer review within an organizational setting. Using a professional model, with shared governance as a framework, the authors discuss the difference between manger initiated staff performance evaluation of the past and the true peer review aspects of professional practice for the future. This text follows in line with the Magnet program requiremet “that nurses at all levels use self appraisal performance review and peer review, including annual goal settings, for the assurance of competence and professional development” page 30 of the 2008 Magnet manual. This unique text teaches nurses the skills they need to demonstrate organizational processes, structures, and outcomes that help insure accountability, competence and autonomy.
National Research Council,Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources,Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program
Author : National Research Council,Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources,Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program Publisher : National Academies Press Page : 67 pages File Size : 55,7 Mb Release : 1997-10-01 Category : Science ISBN : 9780309174459
Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology by National Research Council,Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources,Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program Pdf
The Office of Science and Technology (OST) of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Management (EM) recently has instituted a peer review program that uses the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), with administrative and technical support provided by the Institute for Regulatory Science (RSI), to conduct peer reviews of technologies (or groups of technologies) at various stages of development. OST asked the NRC to convene an expert committee to evaluate the effectiveness of its new peer review program and to make specific recommendations to improve the program, if appropriate. This is the first of two reports to be prepared by this committee on OST's new peer review program. OST requested this interim report to provide a preliminary assessment of OST's new peer review program. In the final report, the committee will provide a more detailed assessment of OST's peer review program after its first complete annual cycle.
Peer Review in Health Sciences by Tom Jefferson,Fiona Godlee Pdf
This book has established itself as the authoritative text on health sciences peer review. Contributions from the world's leading figures discuss the state of peer review, question its role in the currently changing world of electronic journal publishing, and debate where it should go from here. The second edition has been thoroughly revised and new chapters added on qualitative peer review, training, consumers and innovation.
Peer Reviews in Software by Karl Eugene Wiegers Pdf
This practical introduction to peer reviews covers different methods of peer review, from the formal method of inspection to other less formal methods, and addresses the cultural and practical aspects of both.
Writing for Peer Reviewed Journals by Pat Thomson,Barbara Kamler Pdf
This title presents a theorized approach to writing that is crucially combined with strategies designed to assist the writer, guiding them through the various intellectual and practical phases of writing a journal article.
