How To Conduct An Effective Peer Review Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of How To Conduct An Effective Peer Review book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
How to Conduct an Effective Peer Review by Gloria Barczak,Abbie Griffin Pdf
This crucial book guides academics and researchers through the process of peer reviewing manuscript articles, outlining the methods and proficiencies required to write a high-quality review. Gloria Barczak and Abbie Griffin specifically highlight the importance of becoming a first-rate reviewer to early career scholars.
Author : Robert J. Marder,Mark A. Smith,Richard A. Sheff Publisher : HC Pro, Inc. Page : 191 pages File Size : 55,7 Mb Release : 2007 Category : Business & Economics ISBN : 9781601460110
Effective Peer Review by Robert J. Marder,Mark A. Smith,Richard A. Sheff Pdf
HCPro is pleased to introduce Effective Peer Review: A Practical Guide to Contemporary Design, Second Edition, authored by The Greeley Company experts, Robert J. Marder, MD and Mark A. Smith, MD, MBA, FACS. Completely updated to help you: * Comply with The Joint Commission's 2007 standards * Deliver focused and ongoing professional practice evaluations * Evaluate physician core competencies * And much more! Peer review continues to rate as a top problematic issue and one you can't ignore. The pressure is driven by publicly available national data, The Joint Commission's 2007 standards expanding measurement of physician competence, and hospital boards' need to be assured that the peer review process is functioning effectively. Learn how to go beyond just satisfying a regulatory requirement to performing peer review that fosters true improvement within your facility. Although hospitals go through the motions of peer review, they are often unable to make it a meaningful process-one that results in true improvement in physician performance and meets The Joint Commission's standards. Transform your peer review process and meet external requirements with Effective Peer Review: A Practical Guide to Contemporary Design, Second Edition. Get best practices to make peer review worthwhile Newly updated and in high demand, Effective Peer Review, Second Edition, outlines and provides advice about how to do physician peer review effectively. Authored by experts from The Greeley Company, this book and CD-ROM goes beyond just reviewing the Joint Commission standards. It puts the standards in context by emphasizing best practices you can implement in your peer review process. Plus, you'll receive thorough discussion about data analysis and collection, along with peer review scoring and rating systems. Critical information at your fingertips Offering step-by-step guidance to peer review, this book and CD-ROM will help you: * Streamline your exist
National Research Council,Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources,Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program
Author : National Research Council,Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources,Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program Publisher : National Academies Press Page : 67 pages File Size : 41,8 Mb Release : 1997-10-01 Category : Science ISBN : 9780309174459
Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology by National Research Council,Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources,Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program Pdf
The Office of Science and Technology (OST) of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Management (EM) recently has instituted a peer review program that uses the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), with administrative and technical support provided by the Institute for Regulatory Science (RSI), to conduct peer reviews of technologies (or groups of technologies) at various stages of development. OST asked the NRC to convene an expert committee to evaluate the effectiveness of its new peer review program and to make specific recommendations to improve the program, if appropriate. This is the first of two reports to be prepared by this committee on OST's new peer review program. OST requested this interim report to provide a preliminary assessment of OST's new peer review program. In the final report, the committee will provide a more detailed assessment of OST's peer review program after its first complete annual cycle.
Effective Peer Review The Complete Guide to Physician Performance Improvement, Third Edition Robert J. Marder, MD Peer review continues to rate as a top problematic issue in healthcare organizations. Even if they are meeting regulatory standards, most organizations struggle to develop a peer review program that is meaningful to physicians, causing them to become resistant to this performance measurement tool. This new edition explains the connection between peer review, OPPE, and FPPE. It also contains updated information on OPPE and FPPE as related to The Joint Commission''s standards. This book also incorporates three previous books: Effective Peer Review, Peer Review Best Practices, and Measuring Physician Competency. Now readers have one, all-encompassing resource to answer their peer review and physician performance questions. This completely updated book will help you: Engage physicians in the peer review process Create tools to recognize and celebrate excellence Design OPPE profiles and create a plan for distributing the information to physicians Eliminate bias and improve case reviewer efficiency Determine if your peer review policies comply with regulatory standards Take a look at the Table of Contents: Chapter 1: Peer Review: Why Do We Need to Measure Physician Competence? What Peer Review Is What Peer Review Is Not Who Is a Peer? Impartiality and Conflicts of interest Sham Peer Reviews The Duty to Perform Effective Peer Review Should Physicians Be Paid to Perform Peer Reviews? Chapter 2: From Punitive to Positive: Creating a Performance Improvement Culture for Peer Review How Can Culture Change? Values of a Performance Improvement-Focused Peer Review Culture Peer Review and the Just Culture Chapter 3: Legal Considerations: Impact of Regulations and Liability on Peer Review Redefining Peer Review: OPPE, FPPE, and the Core Competencies How the Standards Apply Peer Review Protection Laws Affirmative Duty to Keep Information Confidential Fair Hearings The National Practitioner Data Bank Negligent Peer Review Chapter 4: Peer Review Structures: The Impact of Multi-Specialty Peer Review Peer Review Structures: Three Primary Functions Goals for Peer Review Redesign Basic Peer Review Models Who Should Oversee Peer Review? Selecting the Right Model Physician Behavior: Who Should Handle It? Chapter 5: Measuring Physician Performance: What to Measure and How to Do It Fairly? What Is a Physician Performance Indicator? Indicator Validity: Selecting Physician-Driven Measures What Are You Required to Measure? What to Measure: Structure, Process, and Outcome How to Measure Physicians Fairly: Review, Rate, and Rule Indicators Understanding and Improving Risk- Adjusted Data Using Perception Data to Evaluate Physician Performance Case Study Indicator Selection Chapter 6: Case Review: Reducing Bias and Improving Reviewer Efficiency and Effectiveness Standardizing the Case Review Process Case Identification and Screening Physician Reviewer Assignment Physician Review and Initial Case Rating Initial Committee Review and Physician Input Committee Decision and Improvement Opportunity Identification Communication of Findings and Follow-Up Accountability Case Rating Systems Case Review and the Electronic Age Chapter 7: Selecting Physician-Driven Measures for OPPE: Understanding and Applying the Six Core Competencies ACGME, ABMS, and The Joint Commission: Where Did the Core Competencies Come From and How Are They Used? Alternative Frameworks to the Core Competencies Using the Competency Statement and Expectations to Drive Physician Performance Measures Applying the Core Competencies to OPPE Chapter 8: Physician Data Attribution: Making OPPE Data Meaningful to Individual Physicians Using Imprecise Data for OPPE Attribution and Case Review Improving Attribution for Process Measures Outcome Measure Attribution in a Multiple-Provider World Attribution and Patient Satisfaction Data Chapter 9: Evaluating OPPE Data: Using Benchmarks and Targets for FPPE and the Pursuit of Excellence Understanding Normative Data Interpreting OPPE Data for a Time Interval How to Set Indicator Targets Targets for Indicator Types Interpreting OPPE Data for Trends Chapter 10: From OPPE to FPPE: Creating Accountability for Physician Performance Improvement Accountability for FPPE Initiation, Monitoring, and Follow-Up Designing an Effective FPPE Plan Getting Physician Buy-In for Improvement Opportunities and FPPE What Happens If FPPE Fails? Chapter 11: OPPE Profiles and Physician Performance Feedback: Practical Principles for Competency Report Design and Distribution OPPE Profile and Physician Performance Feedback Report: What Is the Difference? Designing the Report Define the Principles: 10 Questions to Guide Your Design Create a Format That Reflects the Design Principles Preparing and Distributing Competency Data Reports Develop the Infrastructure and Support Materials Pilot-Test Your Design Create a Policy for Physician Competency Reports Chapter 12: External Peer Review in a Physician Improvement Culture EPR Uses The EPR Policy What Circumstances Typically Require EPR? Who Determines When EPR Is Needed? Who Will Select the Reviewer? How Will the Cases Be Selected? Who Will Review the EPR Report Findings? How Will the Results Be Used? Beyond Case-Based EPR: Physician Assessment Programs Chapter 13: Reporting Peer Review: What Does the Board Need to Know? Contemporary Board Accountabilities for Hospital Quality What Keeps the Board Awake at Night? Filling In the Knowledge Gap: Helping Boards Understand Physician Competency Measurement What Data Should the Board Get? Chapter 14: Running an Effective Peer Review Committee Meeting Elements of an Effective Meeting Role of the Committee Chair Responsibilities of Committee Members in Meeting Preparation and Management Practical Tips for Managing Committee Discussion to Avoid Wasting Physician Time Chapter 15: Beyond the Hospital Walls: Peer Review in Ambulatory Care and ACOs Why Would You Want to Do Peer Review in a Nonhospital Setting? Can You Do Peer Review in the Nonhospital Setting? What Data Can You Obtain From the Hospital and What Are You Willing to Share? Peer Review Outside the Hospital: How Should You Organize It? Peer Review Outside the Hospital: What Can You Measure? Chapter 16: Creating Effective Peer Review Policies and Procedures What Do Your Policies and Procedures Need to Cover? Redesigning Your Peer Review Program: A Step-by-Step Guide Should You Do This Yourself or Get Some Help?
How To Survive Peer Review by Elizabeth Wager,Fiona Godlee,Tom Jefferson Pdf
How to Survive Peer Review is a practical handbook designed to help anybody who wants to get their work published in a scientific journal, wants to apply for research funds or who has to undergo formal appraisals at work. It will also help people who have been asked to review articles, abstracts or grant applications. These activities are an essential part of scientific life, yet they virtually never get covered in professional training. It is often difficult even to get any helpful information about the processes from journals, meetings or funders. For the first time, this book brings together all you need to know, with authoritative advice from three authors who have researched peer review extensively and have considerable practical experience as researchers, editors and reviewers.
Peer Review in Health Sciences by Tom Jefferson,Fiona Godlee Pdf
This book has established itself as the authoritative text on health sciences peer review. Contributions from the world's leading figures discuss the state of peer review, question its role in the currently changing world of electronic journal publishing, and debate where it should go from here. The second edition has been thoroughly revised and new chapters added on qualitative peer review, training, consumers and innovation.
Peer Review Benchmarking: Pursuing Medical Staff Excellence Robert J. Marder, MD Looking for metrics and real-world processes to assess your peer review program? Peer Review Benchmarking: Pursuing Medical Staff Excellenceoffers the tools you need to analyze and redesign your peer review processes. Learn how to quantify your peer review data to measure the success of peer review at your organization and how to best share this information with various departments and committees. Once you use the data to determine what elements of your peer review process you need to redesign, read the case studies in this book from organizations who embarked on peer review redesign and learn from their triumphs and mistakes. This book will help you improve your peer review program by: Integrating redesign of hospital peer review structures for fairness, efficiency, and effectiveness Reducing bias in case review and OPPE Enhancing organizational sharing of peer review information to improve patient care Determining the best structure for your peer review committee
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals by Anonim Pdf
This comprehensive yet concise book provides a thorough and complete guide to every aspect of managing the peer review process for scientific journals. Until now, little information has been readily available on how this important facet of the journal publishing process should be conducted properly. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals fills this gap and provides clear guidance on all aspects of peer review, from manuscript submission to final decision. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals is an essential reference for science journal editors, editorial office staff and publishers. It is an invaluable handbook for the set-up of new Editorial Offices, as well as a useful reference for well-established journals which may need guidance on a particular situation, or may want to review their current practices. Although intended primarily for journals in science, much of its content will be relevant to other scholarly areas. ?This wonderful work by Dr. Hames can be used as a textbook in courses for both experienced and novice editors, and I trust that it is what Dr. Hames intended when she prepared this beautiful book. Every scientific editor should read it.? Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professionals, 2008 This book is co-published with the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) (www.alpsp.org) ALPSP members are entitled to a 30% discount on this book.
Peer Review in an Era of Evaluation by Eva Forsberg Pdf
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer review is as old as modern science itself, recent changes in the evaluation culture of higher education systems have increased the use of peer review, and its purposes, forms and functions have become more diversified. This book put together a comprehensive set of conceptual and empirical contributions on various peer review practices with relevance for the scientific community and higher education institutions worldwide. Consisting of three parts, the editors and contributors examine the history, problems and developments of peer review, as well as the specificities of various peer review practices. In doing so, this book gives an overview on and examine peer review , and asks how it can move forward. Eva Forsberg is Professor of Education at Uppsala University, Sweden. Her research focuses education governance and evaluation, academic work and the interface between educational policy, practice and research. Lars Geschwind is Professor in Engineering Education Policy and Management at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. His main research interests are higher education policy, institutional governance, academic leadership and academic work. Sara Levander is Senior Lecturer and Researcher in Education at Uppsala University, Sweden. Her research interests are higher education, academic work and faculty evaluation in academic recruitment and promotion. Wieland Wermke is Associate Professor in Special Education at Stockholm University, Sweden. His research interest focuses on comparative education methodology, and teacher practice at different levels of education.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,Health and Medicine Division,Board on the Health of Select Populations,Committee on the Evaluation of Research Management by DoD Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP)
Author : National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,Health and Medicine Division,Board on the Health of Select Populations,Committee on the Evaluation of Research Management by DoD Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) Publisher : National Academies Press Page : 165 pages File Size : 49,6 Mb Release : 2016-12-19 Category : Medical ISBN : 9780309450041
Evaluation of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Review Process by National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,Health and Medicine Division,Board on the Health of Select Populations,Committee on the Evaluation of Research Management by DoD Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) Pdf
The medical research landscape in the United States is supported by a variety of organizations that spend billions of dollars in government and private funds each year to seek answers to complex medical and public health problems. The largest government funder is the National Institutes of Health (NIH), followed by the Department of Defense (DoD). Almost half of DoD's medical research funding is administered by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP). The mission of CDMRP is to foster innovative approaches to medical research in response to the needs of its stakeholdersâ€"the U.S. military, their families, the American public, and Congress. CDMRP funds medical research to be performed by other government and nongovernmental organizations, but it does not conduct research itself. The major focus of CDMRP funded research is the improved prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases, injuries, or conditions that affect service members and their families, and the general public. The hallmarks of CDMRP include reviewing applications for research funding using a two-tiered review process, and involving consumers throughout the process. Evaluation of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Review Process evaluates the CDMRP two-tiered peer review process, its coordination of research priorities with NIH and the Department of Veterans Affairs, and provides recommendations on how the process for reviewing and selecting studies can be improved.
How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries? by Samiran Nundy,Atul Kakar,Zulfiqar A. Bhutta Pdf
This is an open access book. The book provides an overview of the state of research in developing countries – Africa, Latin America, and Asia (especially India) and why research and publications are important in these regions. It addresses budding but struggling academics in low and middle-income countries. It is written mainly by senior colleagues who have experienced and recognized the challenges with design, documentation, and publication of health research in the developing world. The book includes short chapters providing insight into planning research at the undergraduate or postgraduate level, issues related to research ethics, and conduct of clinical trials. It also serves as a guide towards establishing a research question and research methodology. It covers important concepts such as writing a paper, the submission process, dealing with rejection and revisions, and covers additional topics such as planning lectures and presentations. The book will be useful for graduates, postgraduates, teachers as well as physicians and practitioners all over the developing world who are interested in academic medicine and wish to do medical research.
Peer Review in Nursing by Barbara Haag-Heitman,Vicki George Pdf
Peer Review in Nursing: Principles for a Successful Practice is the first nursing publication that approaches the definition and implementation strategies for peer review within an organizational setting. Using a professional model, with shared governance as a framework, the authors discuss the difference between manger initiated staff performance evaluation of the past and the true peer review aspects of professional practice for the future. This text follows in line with the Magnet program requiremet “that nurses at all levels use self appraisal performance review and peer review, including annual goal settings, for the assurance of competence and professional development” page 30 of the 2008 Magnet manual. This unique text teaches nurses the skills they need to demonstrate organizational processes, structures, and outcomes that help insure accountability, competence and autonomy.
Web Writing by Jack Dougherty,Tennyson O'Donnell Pdf
The essays in "Web Writing" respond to contemporary debates over the proper role of the Internet in higher education, steering a middle course between polarized attitudes that often dominate the conversation. The authors argue for the wise integration of web tools into what the liberal arts does best: writing across the curriculum. All academic disciplines value clear and compelling prose, whether that prose comes in the shape of a persuasive essay, scientific report, or creative expression. The act of writing visually demonstrates how we think in original and critical ways and in ways that are deeper than those that can be taught or assessed by a computer. Furthermore, learning to write well requires engaged readers who encourage and challenge us to revise our muddled first drafts and craft more distinctive and informed points of view. Indeed, a new generation of web-based tools for authoring, annotating, editing, and publishing can dramatically enrich the writing process, but doing so requires liberal arts educators to rethink why and how we teach this skill, and to question those who blindly call for embracing or rejecting technology.
The Rebus Guide to Publishing Open Textbooks (So Far) by Apurva Ashok,Zoe Wake Hyde Pdf
This book is a living repository of collective knowledge, written to equip all those who want to publish open textbooks with the resources they need. Representing two years of collaboration, innumerable conversations and exchanges, and a wide range of collective knowledge and experience, it is a book-in-progress and will evolve and grow over time.